The future of artificial intelligence and human rights
The rise of artificial intelligence threatens to shake the foundations of our society and fundamentally change the way it functions. AI can involve robotics or just software. It’s a game-changing technology and is developing fast. AI has the potential to enhance our way of life, but at the same time, it could be a vehicle for discrimination, violation of privacy, new types of weapons and other harm.
It is time to think about an ethical framework that can protect human rights.
On 10 September 2018, the European Commission met with faith-based organisations to discuss AI, including Baha’i, Buddhist, Catholic and Protestant representatives, as well as the Quaker Council for European Affairs (QCEA).
During the meeting, QCEA asked about the regulation of AI to prevent discrimination on the basis of characteristics such as race, religion, sexual orientation, and disability. AI operates on algorithms. If human biases (whether intentional or not) are written into algorithms, this may compromise the objectivity of computers and reinforce discrimination.
AI is all about technology that thinks, learns and adapts for itself. What a challenge for regulation!
Another concern is job loss to automated machines. One study predicted 47% of jobs replaced by AI, whilst a more widely accepted OECD study estimated only 9%. Widespread job loss can devastate communities. And as QCEA said in the meeting, the current momentum of the far-right in Europe makes the next few years particularly dangerous timing for job loss.
The reality, as expressed by the European Commission, is that many jobs will not be completely replaced but become shared tasks between humans and machines. The meeting heard how this raises questions about the nature of work in our society and the need for consideration of universal basic income.
One participant expressed concern about proposals that machines be given legal personality. The humans that create these machines should not escape responsibility for the consequences of their actions. In addition, several faith groups raised concern about the global south (in particular, Africa) being left behind and not considered in the development of any global ethical framework.
Other human rights issues involving AI include lethal autonomous weapons, privacy implications (such as facial recognition software), and the threat to freedom of expression if governments were to use AI to police the Internet.
Funding military AI
The European Defence Fund (2021-27) is set to exponentially increase EU funding for arms research, and there is no specific exclusion for lethal autonomous weapons systems. QCEA called for restrictions on the development of AI systems that can take a human life without human control. The ethics committee needs to seriously consider how potential EU funding for the arms industry might be used for the development of autonomous weapons.
Europe’s positive contribution
The big players in AI, China and the USA, are leaving an ethical gap that the EU could fill. China has shown little interest in ethical considerations, and the USA appears disengaged at present. Some have said that it’s too late for the EU to take a leading position on AI, as the rest of the world has raced ahead. However, the European Commission doesn’t agree.
Fast progress on AI has been made in a few specific areas, and Europe has the advantage of good research labs and promising AI startup businesses. A European ethical framework on AI would be welcome in some parts of the world and could become the global standard. For this reason, for organisations interested in AI, engagement here in Brussels is a must.
In the absence of global governance, AI is an example of why the European Union adds value. Countries need to work together to have any chance of regulating global technological developments.
Next steps for the EU
A high level expert group is developing guidelines for the use of AI in Europe, guided by a statement produced by the European Group on Ethics in Science and New Technologies. One of the proposals being considered is that private sector companies will need to sign up to an ethics charter. Private companies are said to be positive about ethical guidelines, but some worry that this could keep the focus away from hard law and regulation. At present, the European Commission is clear that it understands the need for both ethics and regulation.
More detailed EU proposals will be developed on the ethics of AI by December 2018 with a consultation process running until March 2019. Given the huge potential impact of AI, this must be a public consultation, but it may be more low-key. However, anyone can join the EU consultation platform on AI, called the AI Alliance. You can post questions and see what officials have written.
Europe’s AI moment is now, but it must not forget its best asset – its founding value of protecting human rights.
Isabel Hamilton (American University) and Andrew Lane (QCEA)
Peter Hussey writes: I contacted Gethin Rhys at CYTUN to find out is any work is being done by churches or faith groups in Wales. His reply:
Thank you Peter. I’m not quite sure how we
might handle this ecumenically, but I’m grateful to you for drawing it
to my attention. If you know of anyone in Wales who might be willing to
help us think
about this, I would be glad to hear of them.
So where are the experts on AI in Wales who might provide, at least, a steer on this?
Giles Cuthbert, managing director at the Chartered Banker Institute. “We
have to be absolutely explicit that the AI itself cannot be held
accountable for its actions. This becomes more complex, of course, when
AI starts to learn, but even then, the ability to learn is programmed.”
Dear MP
The rise of artificial intelligence threatens to shake the foundations of our society and fundamentally change the way it functions. It is time for us to think about an ethical framework that can protect human rights. The new GDPR regulations introduced by the European Union are an excellent start. We need to ensure that these regulations are not diluted, regardless of the outcome of Brexit. But it is insufficient to not dilute them, we should be building on them.
There is a need for regulation of AI to prevent discrimination on the basis of characteristics such as race, religion, sexual orientation, and disability. AI operates on algorithms. If human biases (whether intentional or not) are written into algorithms, this may compromise the objectivity of computers and reinforce discrimination.
Another concern is job loss to automated machines. One study predicted 47% of jobs replaced by AI, whilst a more widely accepted OECD study estimated only 9%. Widespread job loss has already devastated communities. This is a very appropriate time to seriously consider the concept of the basic wage.(universal basic income).
AI will, of course, be mainly taken forward by the arms industry opening an enormous can of worms! Meanwhile some cities, in particular Barcelona and Amsterdam are beginning to explore the possibilities of AI built on a human-centric, ethical policy and regulatory framework with new rules against market dominance of tech platform giants. Uber is monopolising data about transport and movements, Airbnb are garnering huge data about houses, homes and who lives there. Amazon and Facebook simply know everything about everybody. Just about everything produces data, roads, trains and plastic cards to name just a few, and all that data gets sucked up by the major platforms and is the currency that they value most. We need ambitious and structural interventions that will tackle the question of data ownership and who is going to own the AI services built with that data. Fortunately the Labour Party is researching and fleshing out policies to reflect this enormous area of influence.
Yours sincerely
Dear Peter Hussey
No reply so far from my MP, but here is a very helpful response from Eluned Morgan AM.
Thank you for your recent email expressing your concerns about the many uses artificial intelligence is now put to. As you point out this has made a considerable difference to the way we live and work in a relatively short period of time. Recent well reported incidents suggest that a review of the way AI is used to gather and to use information would be timely and Welsh Government have already begun to do this.
In March 2018 the Welsh Government announced it had established a panel to undertake a ‘Review of Digital Innovation for the Economy and the Future of Work in Wales’. The review aims to gather further insight on the challenges and opportunities associated with digital innovation in the context of the Welsh economy and the future of work. The review is being chaired by Professor Phil Brown, Distinguished Research Professor at Cardiff University, and is being supported by a specially convened Expert Panel.
The review panel will make final recommendations to the Welsh Government by March 2019, although the review has the scope to provide ongoing advice so that new ideas can be tested and learnt from at the earliest opportunity. An interim report is expected to be published by the end of November 2018.
The term ‘digital innovation’ is being used to capture the wide range of technology advancements – both physical and digital – being made in automation, robotics, artificial intelligence, internet of things and large-scale data. I believe the review is still underway and would welcome contributions. Further information on the review, its terms of reference and work activities to date, can be accessed online here. I hope that you find the information available at this website useful, if the panel are not addressing all of the issues you are concerned about they may be able to refer you to other groups who are.
If I can be of any further assistance please do not hesitate to contact me or a member of my team.
Dear MP
The rise of artificial intelligence threatens to shake the foundations of our society and fundamentally change the way it functions. It is time for us to think about an ethical framework that can protect human rights. The new GDPR regulations introduced by the European Union are an excellent start. We need to ensure that these regulations are not diluted, regardless of the outcome of Brexit. But it is insufficient to not dilute them, we should be building on them.
There is a need for regulation of AI to prevent discrimination on the basis of characteristics such as race, religion, sexual orientation, and disability. AI operates on algorithms. If human biases (whether intentional or not) are written into algorithms, this may compromise the objectivity of computers and reinforce discrimination.
Another concern is job loss to automated machines. One study predicted 47% of jobs replaced by AI, whilst a more widely accepted OECD study estimated only 9%. Widespread job loss has already devastated communities. This is a very appropriate time to seriously consider the concept of the basic wage.(universal basic income).
AI will, of course, be mainly taken forward by the arms industry opening an enormous can of worms! Meanwhile some cities, in particular Barcelona and Amsterdam are beginning to explore the possibilities of AI built on a human-centric, ethical policy and regulatory framework with new rules against market dominance of tech platform giants. Uber is monopolising data about transport and movements, Airbnb are garnering huge data about houses, homes and who lives there. Amazon and Facebook simply know everything about everybody. Just about everything produces data, roads, trains and plastic cards to name just a few, and all that data gets sucked up by the major platforms and is the currency that they value most. We need ambitious and structural interventions that will tackle the question of data ownership and who is going to own the AI services built with that data. Fortunately the Labour Party is researching and fleshing out policies to reflect this enormous area of influence.
Yours sincerely
Dear Peter Hussey
No reply so far from my MP, but here is a very helpful response from Eluned Morgan AM.
Thank you for your recent email expressing your concerns about the many uses artificial intelligence is now put to. As you point out this has made a considerable difference to the way we live and work in a relatively short period of time. Recent well reported incidents suggest that a review of the way AI is used to gather and to use information would be timely and Welsh Government have already begun to do this.
In March 2018 the Welsh Government announced it had established a panel to undertake a ‘Review of Digital Innovation for the Economy and the Future of Work in Wales’. The review aims to gather further insight on the challenges and opportunities associated with digital innovation in the context of the Welsh economy and the future of work. The review is being chaired by Professor Phil Brown, Distinguished Research Professor at Cardiff University, and is being supported by a specially convened Expert Panel.
The review panel will make final recommendations to the Welsh Government by March 2019, although the review has the scope to provide ongoing advice so that new ideas can be tested and learnt from at the earliest opportunity. An interim report is expected to be published by the end of November 2018.
The term ‘digital innovation’ is being used to capture the wide range of technology advancements – both physical and digital – being made in automation, robotics, artificial intelligence, internet of things and large-scale data. I believe the review is still underway and would welcome contributions. Further information on the review, its terms of reference and work activities to date, can be accessed online here. I hope that you find the information available at this website useful, if the panel are not addressing all of the issues you are concerned about they may be able to refer you to other groups who are.
If I can be of any further assistance please do not hesitate to contact me or a member of my team.